The Einstein Effect in Learning – Magie des Maths

Standard

Today was the premiere of the second episode of my documentary on (French) undergrad maths. I’ve had plenty of feedbacks already, with fundamental questions about the way I popularize maths.

Roughly, while the narrative of the documentary is quite understandable, I’ve decided to include high-level interviews. For instance, in the first episode available online, one interview sequence is about abstract algebras. In particular, interviewees show great excitement regarding so-called groups, rings and fields, which are not defined (groups are defined shortly after). Thus, if you haven’t learned about these mathematical structures yet, you will be lost in this interview sequence. I know it. I planned it.

Granted, viewers may reject the whole of maths, because they feel that they will never be able to understand this section. Yet, that is the opposite of the asserted aim of the video, which is rather about making maths attractive. I know that. And that deeply bothers me. So why did I plan to have the audience confused? There are several reasons for this.

First, I wanted interviewees to get excited about maths, and, as weird as it might sound to you right now, such structures easily got (most of) them excited. And I think it’s pretty cool to hear mathematicians getting excited. Second, mathematics is hard. And mathematicians spend the overwhelming majority of their time trying to make sense of what they don’t understand. To enjoy mathematics definitely requires being comfortable with not understanding. Or at least, that’s what I think. Third, anyone who does know about these structures will greatly enjoy these sections.

But more importantly, I want to plant seeds of what I call the “Einstein effect”. Why did you read this post in the first place? I bet it’s because I mentioned “Einstein” in the title… and you’ve heard somewhere that Einstein was a big deal. In fact, back in undergrads, I distinctly remember the relativity theory course being full, as opposed to the Galois theory one. Why? Is it because relativity theory is more useful or more beautiful? I don’t think so. Relativity theory is useless for all engineers, and the Galois theory is arguably the most beautiful mathematical theory ever. So, what makes relativity theory more attractive than Galois theory?

I think it’s because people have been more exposed to physicists’ excitements about Einstein’s work than to mathematicians’ trepidations regarding Galois’. And this is essential in the learning process! Think about the most boring math course you’ve had. If, at some point, someone told you that what you were learning was a key concept for understanding Einstein’s relativity, this would probably awake you and give you a small boost. This boost is what I call the “Einstein effect”. And it may be just what you need to be willing to do what’s necessary to grasp the concept (that is, spending hours pondering).

Similarly, I think that if a student has been exposed to the importance of groups, rings and fields or Galois theory, he might have this necessary additional boost to pay attention to the professor as the professor defines these concepts… That’s why, while talking about difficult concepts in a popularization video may be negative in the short run, I believe it to be very useful in the longer run. Besides, it’s also why I think we shouldn’t only teach numbers and basic geometry to kids. We should also tell them about infinite series (like 1+2+4+8+16+…=-1), probabilities (like the Monty Hall problem) and topology (like Pacman living in a torus), even if they don’t get it all!

What do you think?

Advertisements

First Episode Released – Magie des Maths

Standard

Here it is! The first episode of my 2-episode documentary series has been released a week ago. There are English subtitles. Check it out!

Please consider sharing it. I’ve put a lot of effort, and I’d love to reach as many people as possible. Thank you!

Dans cette série, je propose de vous révéler la magie des mathématiques des classes préparatoires aux Grandes Écoles. Ce premier épisode porte sur l’algèbre.

Chapitre 1 – Al-Jabr (1:13)
Chapitre 2 – La géométrie algébrique (12:11)
Chapitre 3 – La théorie des nombres (17:51)
Chapitre 4 – L’algèbre moderne (29:04)
Chapitre 5 – L’algèbre linéaire (40:51)

Aidez-moi à m’améliorer en remplissant le questionnaire suivant :
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1asI9wJ1jrnMWjpWaO29XvORSIK-ZQD0G_Ivt5m-It5M/viewform?usp=send_form

Pour en savoir plus, allez-voir ces liens !
Ellipses, paraboles et hyperboles : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/ellipses-parabolas-hyperbolas/
Cryptographie et théorie des nombres : http://www.science4all.org/scottmckinney/cryptography-and-number-theory/
Cryptographie et physique quantique : http://www.science4all.org/scottmckinney/cryptography-and-quantum-physics/
P versus NP : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/pnp/
Théorie de Galois : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/galois-theory/
Relativité restreinte : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/spacetime-of-special-relativity/
Relativité générale : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/spacetime-of-general-relativity/
Algèbre linéaire : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/linear-algebra/
Programmation linéaire : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/linear-programming/
Physique quantique : http://www.science4all.org/le-nguyen-hoang/quantum-mechanics/

Discovery Hit by Kevin MacLeod
http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/index.html?isrc=USUAN1300023

Thank you to all the persons involved in this project.

Musiques :
Jason Shaw (http://www.audionautix.com/index.php)
J. Lang, Snowflake, Admiral Bob, Onlymeith, Colab (http://dig.ccmixter.org)
Chris Zabriskie, Kevin MacLeod (http://freemusicarchive.org)

CGPGrey’s “Humans Need Not Apply” Video

Standard

Forget about global warming, economic recession, energy and water shortage and other usual political concerns. For me, the big deal is large-scale unemployment. And reducing or preventing it is not a solution.

There’s also a great 1-hour podcast follow-up (start at 33:46). In short, unemployment will skyrocket, not because of recession, but because the overwhelming majority of today’s jobs will be automated. Most humans will be “unemployable through no fault of their own”.

What’s the solution? What will happen? How can we avoid the upcoming riots of unions?

Premiere of Episode 1 – Magie des Maths

Standard

Pffew I breathe again! Sort of…

The premiere of the first episode of my documentary has just been broadcasted in my lab. This was a hugely stressful experience for me, as I cringed at every saturated sound, every mispronounced word and every non-smooth transition… Especially, when after a few minutes, I noticed the 1-second delay between image and sound!

IMG_20140904_150755

How is the audience reacting? Are they disappointed? Are they bored? Are they confused?

IMG_20140904_160449

It’s still too early for me to say as I haven’t talked to them all. So far… it’s okay. There hasn’t been any harsh remark, and people are noticing the huge amount of work I’ve put in this project. But I fear that they’re just being nice…

But many more criticisms are about to come. For sure, I still have a lot of work to do. Never mind about that for now. Right now, I’m just relieved this premiere is over!